Monday, December 02, 2019

AVReading Newsletter December: Small Groups


The use of small groups within our classrooms has a number of advantages.  For starters, we know that students tend to learn more when they actively work to construct knowledge as opposed to when they are fed the information.  We have also learned that  co-constructing knowledge within a group tends to be even more effective and powerful.  Additionally, we have learned that mixed ability groupings offer a number of benefits, bringing together students with a diversity of learning styles and backgrounds for a common purpose.  And then there is the development of those “soft skills” of teamwork and problem solving, we often hear the business community and private sector tout as critical to their operations.  
         Still, using small groups can be messy.  Our Type A students aren’t often fans because they know that they could probably do the work in half the time if they could just do it on their own.  And more than a few students bemoan a grading system that might allow a slacker to benefit from the hard work of fellow group members.  
         None-the-less, students are pretty well accustomed to the practice of small grouping, especially those who have come through the STEM programs at VMS, where many of their big projects are based around the model.  
         Considering both the baggage and the benefits of small groups, it is probably best to be strategic with how we use them.  Here are a few ways I have incorporated them into my lessons.  
         Flex Grouping:  This is the practice of dividing students into groups based on their specific needs.  They differ from the ability grouping of the past in the sense that on any given unit, you might have different combinations of students due to the fact that they are struggling with specific concepts or skills.  Flex grouping works really well for subjects that have discrete parts that can be isolated and developed.  I might use them for grammar and writing units where I can categorize students by areas of need:  a group working on run-on sentences, a group working on capitalization, a group working on sentence structure, a group working on sentence variety etc.  
         Green Mitt / Red Mitt:  For this, you will need five or six pairs of green and red oven mitts.  (You could easily do this with little paper signs that say “agree” or “disagree” as a less expensive option.)  Break the class down into groups of four or five.  Give each group one green mitt (which will represent “agree”) and one red mitt (which will represent “disagree”).  You begin by asking the first group a given question.  They have a chance to answer the question.  The rest of the groups will discuss the answer and either hold up the green mitt or the red mitt.  If they hold up the red mitt, they must provide the correct response.  Points can be divided out to groups that answer the question correctly. You then move on to group two and ask a second question. 
         Reading Hats:  I like doing reading hats when I want a class to really read a text more deeply.  Here is how it works.  I assign the class a reading and divide them into groups.  Each member of the group is then told to read that same passage (on their own) using a different “hat”.  One person should wear the hat of “questioner”.  Their job is to develop five or six questions around the text.  One person wears the hat of “summarizer”.  One person wears the hat of “investigator” (their job is to answer the question, “what is missing from this text”).  One person is to wear the “organizer” hat.  Their job is to discuss how the author organized the text.  One person is to wear the “purpose” hat.  Their job is to identify the main idea, theme, or purpose of the text and provide evidence of it.  One person is the “style editor”.  Their job is to discuss the various shortcomings and strengths of the author’s writing style.
Slide Presentations:  I’ve frequently used small groups to present various concepts or ideas, but the affordances of Google Slides and iPads have made this so much easier to manage and execute.  I divide the class into groups and give each group a concept or idea to research / discuss and present to the class.  I then create one slide show with a slide designated to each group and share it through Schoology.  The slides will be a template of what I want them to cover in their presentations-- usually divided into four or five parts so that every group member has a responsibility.  I give them maybe 20 minutes to research / discuss and populate their slide before we begin presentations.  I used to do this with the big whiteboards (and sometimes still do when I feel that we need to put away the technology for the day), but the digital version is pretty slick and the slides are much easier to read. It is also easier to scaffold the structure and content of the presentations by doing it this way.  
Group Quizzes / Tests / Papers:  The logistics of this can vary depending on the situation, but sometimes completing assessments as a group provides a more unique and meaningful learning experience than if the student were to do it on their own.  In talking with Dan Seppala, the group test is used from time-to-time in pre-calculus.  They use the group test as the second part of an assessment, where the students are placed with others who have scored approximately the same as they did on the first part.  Students then work together on the group test, again making meaning and learning collectively.  I have also worked with students on group papers, where students are divided into groups, and then each one is responsible for one part of a five paragraph essay: one writes the introduction, one the first main idea, one the second main idea, one the third main idea, and one writes the conclusion.  
As mentioned earlier, it might be best to be selective in the use of small group activities.  Making good instructional decisions means that we consider whether the particular lesson fits that approach or whether we have just done group work or whether a given group of students would work better alone than in collaboration with others or even whether they need to learn to work with others.  Ultimately, having small group activities as part of our repertoire gives us more options for how to best address our students at any given time. 

See the entire newsletter here